Should taxpayers subsidize cow horns?
By Diana Oehrli
90% of cows in Switzerland don’t have horns. But unlike the rest of the country, the majority of Saanenland farmers don’t de-horn their cattle. Those who do it, do so for economic and safety reasons. Horns can be dangerous to humans as well as to cows housed in modern free-style barns, which are popular for being less-labor intensive. Horned livestock take up more space and their horns have to be maintained.
But some say that it is unnatural and cruel for a cow to be without its horns. Without them, cows cannot defend themselves and their young from predators and bullying cows, nor can they scratch themselves. To change the de-horning trend, a small farmer in the Bernese Jura has submitted a proposal that would subsidize farmers who keep horned animals with one franc per cow per day, or 20-rappen per goat per day. His proposal has garnered support from animal protection advocates, ecologists, and small farmers. The federal department for agriculture is reviewing the proposal. Local politicians Erich von Siebenthal and Bethli Küng are split on the subsidy issue (von Siebenthal is for it), but both agree that cows should have horns.
Should farmers who keep horned animals receive subsidies? Let us know what you think!
What do you think? (Comments 2)















Recent Comments